Focused case guide
AFFF Settlement: Water Systems and Injury Claims
3M signed a $7.35 billion personal-injury agreement on November 3, 2026, subject to participation thresholds. The court set November 13 for claimant identification. Public-water-system settlements have separate rules and dates.
Guide reviewed: . Litigation data reviewed: .
Lawsuit status — November 2026
AFFF Firefighting Foam (PFAS) Lawsuit
Verified November 11, 2026
- MDL
- MDL-2873
- Court
- D.S.C.
- Judge
- Judge Richard M. Gergel
- Current phase
- 3M personal-injury agreement and claimant identification; separate water-system settlements
- Settlement status
- agreement signed; claimant identification underway
- Latest development
- 3M signed a November 3, 2026 personal-injury agreement with a $7.35 billion nominal commitment through 2034, subject to participation thresholds. The agreement is separate from the public-water-system settlements and provides no fixed payout for every individual claimant.
- Next major event
- November 13, 2026 — 3M personal-injury claimant identification due
Verified settlement record
The entries below use the same reviewed case record as the national guide. Each program has its own scope.
3M — personal-injury settlement agreement
agreement signed; claimant identification underway
3M signed a November 3, 2026 personal-injury agreement with a $7.35 billion nominal commitment through 2034, subject to participation thresholds. The agreement is separate from the public-water-system settlements and provides no fixed payout for every individual claimant.
3M — public water systems
final approved, claims administration — water systems only
$10.5 billion to $12.5 billion paid over 13 years to public water systems for PFAS contamination, per the official settlement FAQ. Final approval entered by Judge Gergel (fairness hearing February 2, 2024). Compensates water utilities, not individuals.
DuPont / Chemours / Corteva — public water systems
final approved, claims administration — water systems only
$1.185 billion settlement resolving claims of roughly 14,000 public water systems. Final approval entered following the December 14, 2023 fairness hearing.
Tyco Fire Products / Chemguard — public water systems
final approved, claims administration — water systems only
$750 million settlement; final approval order entered November 2024 (ECF 6406).
BASF — public water systems
final approved, claims administration — water systems only
$316.5 million total ($312.5M settlement amount + $4M notice/administration); agreement signed May 20, 2024, final approval entered November 22, 2024.
Carrier, Amerex, Archroma and Nation Ford — proposed public-water-system settlements
preliminary approval; final approval pending
The administrator lists four additional proposed water-system settlements with preliminary approval. Its C.A.A.N. schedule lists objections due November 23, 2026, exclusion requests due December 22, 2026, and a final fairness hearing on January 15, 2027. These are not individual personal-injury programs.
Who receives the public water system settlements?
The court-supervised administrator identifies four finally approved settlements involving 3M, DuPont-related entities, Tyco/Chemguard, and BASF. They address claims involving PFAS contamination in public water systems' drinking water. Those utility settlements should not be presented as an individual cancer payout program. Source: official PFAS water settlement administrator.
For a settlement headline, first identify the named defendant, the covered class, the type of loss, and the official agreement. A dollar amount without those details is not enough to evaluate whether the announcement concerns the claim you are researching.
Who must be identified by November 13?
Under CMO 39, counsel must identify eligible clients, including eligible unfiled clients, by November 13, 2026. Eligible people already representing themselves in the MDL on covered personal-injury claims against 3M must identify themselves by the same date. Identification is the first step. The settlement election and claim package are separate. Read CMO 39.
CMO 40 stays covered MDL proceedings as to 3M, subject to the procedures and exceptions in CMOs 39 and 40. The stay leaves claims against other defendants outside its scope. Read CMO 40.
The AFFF court maintains a separate set of personal-injury case-management orders. Its August 15, 2025 Order No. 35 addresses specified injury categories and proof requirements and vacated the October 2025 bellwether trial setting. That order is not a public payout schedule. Source: CMO 35.
For the currently verified personal-injury settlement posture, read the dated record above and its source. Keep a personal exposure and diagnosis file separate from a utility's testing or treatment-cost file. Sharing an MDL number does not make the two files interchangeable.
The national AFFF guide covers the allegations and current case management. Defendants dispute the allegations. The MDL 2873 guide explains the federal proceeding and points to the court's records.
How to assess a settlement announcement
- Recipient: does the agreement cover a public water system, an individual, or another defined group?
- Scope: which defendants, claims, products, and time periods does it address?
- Stage: is the document a proposal, an approval order, or a notice about claims administration?
- Calculation: is the number a total fund, an allocation formula, or an award to a specific claimant?
- Action: which form, supporting documents, and submission instructions apply?
This checklist is a reading aid. It does not establish membership in a settlement or calculate a recovery. Read the agreement's actual definitions and ask the administrator to clarify its procedures.
Water-system deadlines are program-specific
The administrator publishes separate deadlines for different defendants, phases, and claim forms. A later supplemental-fund date should not be read as a blanket extension of earlier claim deadlines. Source: official administrator's deadline table.
Record the exact name of the form and the source of its deadline. For individual injury litigation, use the state guides below and obtain a review of the applicable filing rules. The site's deadline tracker is a public research index, not a determination of a person's filing date.
State context and filing deadlines
These state guides provide local context. A state overview cannot determine a deadline for an individual claim.